|
Benchmark Results
Read Speed -
CAS 3
|
|

|
| FSB |
Read
Speed |
Boost |
| 158MHz |
392.2
MB/s |
+
18.92% |
| 150MHz |
373.7
MB/s |
+
13.31% |
| 133MHz |
329.8
MB/s |
Baseline |
|
|
The read performance of the DIMM scales linearly with the increase
in FSB speed. Overclocking it to the maximum speed of 158MHz
afforded an increase in read performance of about 5% over
that of 150MHz, which isn't too bad at all.
Read Speed -
CAS 2 |
|

|
| FSB |
Read
Speed |
Boost |
| 153MHz |
420.8
MB/s |
+
15.22% |
| 150MHz |
413.5
MB/s |
+
13.23% |
| 133MHz |
365.2
MB/s |
Baseline |
|
|
At CAS 2, the maximum achievable clockspeed was only 153MHz, 5MHz
less than at CAS 3. The extra 3MHz only improved the read
performance by 1.77% over that of 150MHz. Hardly
significant enough to matter.
Write Speed -
CAS 3
|
|

|
| FSB |
Write
Speed |
Boost |
| 158MHz |
425.4
MB/s |
+
18.86% |
| 150MHz |
405.4
MB/s |
+
13.27% |
| 133MHz |
357.9
MB/s |
Baseline |
|
|
Just as it was with the read performance, the Performance Enhanced
DIMM's write performance scaled linearly with the increase in
clockspeed. Again, the extra 8MHz improved performance by 5%
over that of the DIMM at 150MHz.
Write Speed -
CAS 2
|
|

|
| FSB |
Write
Speed |
Boost |
| 153MHz |
421.9
MB/s |
+
15.30% |
| 150MHz |
414.4
MB/s |
+
13.25% |
| 133MHz |
365.9
MB/s |
Baseline |
|
|
Nothing much to comment here. Similar scale of improvement with each
bump in the clockspeed. And again, the performance benefit (+1.8%)
from the meagre extra 3MHz that the DIMM could take beyond 150MHz
wasn't anything to talk about.
CAS 3 vs. CAS 2
Comparison
|