|
Surprisingly, NEC states that the Vr4122 scored 216 Dhrystone
MIPS at 180MHz while the older Vr4121 scored 210 Dhrystone
MIPS at 168MHz. That means that the Vr4122 is actually slower than
the Vr4121 at equivalent clockspeeds! If so, then what advantages
does the Vr4122 have over the Vr4121?
The most obvious are the higher clockspeeds. The slowest speed
grade is 150MHz although the Vr4122 can run up to 180MHz. The Vr4121, however, is
only rated at 131MHz and 168MHz. As Casio uses only the slower
speed grades in their Pocket PCs, so the E-125 has a 14.5%
(19MHz) advantage in clockspeed over the E-115. We will see
later if this increase in clockspeed actually translates into an
equivalent increase in performance.
The main advantages of the Vr4122, however, are lower power
consumption and thermal dissipation. Even at a 7%
higher clockspeed, it consumes only 270mW, compared to the
Vr4121's 350mW. That's a saving of nearly 23% which will
translate into less heat dissipation and longer battery life. This
is all due to the thinner fabrication process used in the Vr4122
(0.18 microns instead of 0.25 microns).
|